Astro NextJs Web Development

From NextJs to Astro

Why I Made the Switch

When I decided to redesign my portfolio, I took the opportunity to explore new technologies. My previous portfolio was built with NextJS, which served me well, but I was intrigued by Astro’s promise of “content-focused” web development and its “ship zero JavaScript by default” approach.

The NextJS Experience

NextJS is an excellent framework with many strengths:

  • Rich Ecosystem: The React ecosystem and extensive library support
  • Dynamic Features: Great for interactive applications
  • Server-Side Rendering: Robust SSR capabilities
  • Full-Stack Framework: API routes and database integration

However, for a portfolio site, I found myself not utilizing many of these features. I was essentially building a static site with minimal interactivity.

Enter Astro

Astro caught my attention for several reasons:

  1. Performance First: Astro’s approach to JavaScript - only sending it when necessary - results in incredibly fast page loads.

  2. Content Focus: The built-in content collections and Markdown/MDX support make managing blog posts and project descriptions a breeze.

  3. Framework Flexibility: While I primarily use vanilla JavaScript and Tailwind CSS, I can still use components from many other frameworks within it when interactivity is needed - in my case I chose to pair Astro with React.

  4. Simple Development: The development experience is straightforward and intuitive. Routes are super simple to use, and features like Content Collections make it super easy to manage content with minimal development work and no CMS.

Key Differences I’ve Noticed

Development Experience

NextJS

  • More boilerplate code
  • Need to manage state even for static content
  • Hot reloading can be slower

Astro

  • Minimal setup required
  • Content collections are a game-changer
  • Lightning-fast development server

Performance

The performance difference has been noticeable:

  • Lighthouse scores improved significantly
  • First contentful paint reduced.
  • Time to interactive nearly instant

What I Miss from NextJS

While Astro has been fantastic, there are some NextJS features I miss:

  1. Image Optimization: NextJS’s Image component is more sophisticated
  2. Built-in Routing: NextJS’s file-based routing is more feature-rich
  3. API Routes: Though not needed for my portfolio, they’re great to have

Best Use Cases

Choose NextJS When:

  • Building a full-stack application
  • Need real-time features
  • Heavy client-side interactions
  • Complex state management

Choose Astro When:

  • Content-focused websites
  • Static sites with minimal interactivity
  • Prioritizing performance
  • Blog or documentation sites

Conclusion

For my portfolio, Astro has been the perfect choice. The transition was smooth, and the benefits have been clear:

  • Faster load times
  • Simpler content management
  • Reduced complexity
  • Better developer experience

While NextJS remains an excellent framework, Astro’s focused approach to static site generation makes it the ideal choice for content-heavy sites like portfolios and blogs.

Final Thoughts

The web development landscape continues to evolve, and it’s exciting to see frameworks like Astro pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with static site generation. While NextJS and Astro serve different purposes, having options that excel in specific use cases is a win for developers.

Remember: choose the right tool for your specific needs. For my portfolio, Astro was that tool.

Back to Blog